2 Kings 3:27

0
September 17, 2025
KJV
Then he took his eldest son that should have reigned in his stead, and offered him [for] a burnt offering upon the wall. And there was great indignation against Israel: and they departed from him, and returned to [their own] land.
BSB
So he took his firstborn son, who was to succeed him, and offered him as a burnt offering on the city wall. And there was great fury against the Israelites, so they withdrew and returned to their own land.
WEB
Then he took his eldest son who would have reigned in his place, and offered him for a burnt offering on the wall. There was great wrath against Israel: and they departed from him, and returned to their own land.
YLT
and he taketh his son, the first-born who reigneth in his stead, and causeth him to ascend—a burnt-offering on the wall, and there is great wrath against Israel, and they journey from off him, and turn back to the land.
F.O.G Original
So he took his oldest son who was to be king in his place and ascended him as a burnt offering on the wall. And great wrath came against Isra’el, and they departed away from him and returned to their own land.
F.O.G
So he took his oldest son who was to be king in his place and ascended him as a burnt offering on the wall. And great wrath came against Isra’el, and they departed away from him and returned to their own land.
F.O.G MSG

When Human Sacrifice Seemingly Worked

What’s This Verse About?
The king of Moab is losing a battle against Israel, completely surrounded on the brink of defeat, he does the unthinkable and sacrifices his own son on the city wall. Suddenly, “great wrath” comes upon Israel and they have to retreat. It’s one of the Bible’s most unsettling verses because the pagan sacrifice seems to actually work; or maybe something else is going on?

The Hebrew That Changes Everything

The phrase in question is vayehi qetzef gadol al-Yisrael – “and there was great wrath upon Israel.” But whose wrath? The Hebrew word qetzef usually describes divine anger, but the text is deliberately ambiguous about the source.

Here’s what makes Hebrew scholars scratch their heads: the verb vayehi (there was) is passive. It doesn’t tell us who or what caused this wrath. It just… happens. After the sacrifice. And it’s effective enough to make three armies pack up in terror and run home.

The king “takes his firstborn son who was to reign after him” – the Hebrew bekoro emphasizes this isn’t just any son, but the heir, the future of the dynasty.

Ancient Grammar Geekery

The word for “offered” is *ya’aleh* – literally “caused to go up.” It’s the same term used for legitimate burnt offerings in the Temple. The author is using sacrificial language typically reserved for proper worship, which makes this even more disturbing.

What Would the Original Audience Have Heard?

Ancient Near Eastern listeners would have understood exactly what was happening here. When kings were desperate, they played their ultimate card: royal child sacrifice. Mesopotamian texts describe kings sacrificing their children to turn the tide of battle, and sometimes it worked.

But here’s what would have horrified Hebrew audiences: this happens right after Elisha performed a miracle providing water for Israel’s army (verses 16-20). God just demonstrated His power for Israel, and now a pagan sacrifice seems to override it? That’s theologically scandalous if true.

Did You Know?

The Moabite Stone (discovered in 1868) mentions King Mesha’s conflicts with Israel and his devotion to the god Chemosh. While it doesn’t mention child sacrifice, it shows Mesha was exactly the kind of king who would make such a desperate gambit.

But Wait… Did the Sacrifice Actually Work?

This is where the text gets maddeningly ambiguous. Three interpretations have dominated scholarly discussion for centuries:

  1. Divine wrath: God was angry at Israel for some unstated reason and used this moment to express it
  2. Moabite wrath: The people of Moab were so enraged by their king’s sacrifice that they fought with supernatural fury
  3. Israelite horror: The Israelites were so disgusted by witnessing child sacrifice that they lost the will to fight

The Hebrew supports all three readings. Maybe that’s intentional. Maybe the ambiguity is the point.

Wait, That’s Strange…

Israel had divine approval for this campaign – Elisha prophesied victory and provided miraculous water. So why does everything fall apart after one pagan ritual? The text offers no explanation, which makes it even more unsettling.

The Wrestling Match

This verse challenges everything we think we know about how God works. We expect pagan rituals to fail and divine promises to succeed. But here, the opposite happens. A father murders his son, and somehow it changes the entire trajectory of a divinely-ordained military campaign.

The most disturbing possibility is that God was disgusted by Israel’s willingness to witness child sacrifice without intervening. Maybe the “wrath” was God’s revulsion at His people’s moral passivity. The Israelites came to conquer but stayed to watch a child burn.

Or maybe as my mentor John Paul Jackson teaches – it was because Israel’s devotion to Him wasn’t as committed as the Moabite King was to his ‘god’. Scripture calls Him a jealous God for a reason.

Or maybe this is what happens when we reduce faith to a formula. God isn’t a vending machine where the right inputs guarantee the right outputs. Sometimes evil acts have consequences that disrupt even divine plans – not because God approves, but because human choices on this earth matter, even terrible ones.

Sometimes the most unsettling Bible verses are the ones that refuse to give us easy answers about how God works in a broken world.

How This Changes Everything

This passage demolishes any simplistic theology that says righteous people always win and evil always fails immediately. It forces us to grapple with the reality that we live in a world where horrific acts can have strategic consequences, where evil sometimes appears to triumph temporarily. But we Christians have read the end of the book and know the final outcome.

The text doesn’t celebrate the sacrifice or suggest it was effective because Chemosh is a real God. Instead, it records the brutal reality: sometimes human evil creates momentum that disrupts even God’s plans, not because God is weak, but because He gave the earth for man to rule over and He allows human choices – even abhorrent ones – to have real consequences.

Did you Know

This event happens during the ministry of Elisha, who regularly demonstrated God’s power through miracles. Yet here, human evil creates a situation where God’s prophet’s victory prediction doesn’t materialize as expected. The contrast is intentional and disturbing.

The Unspoken Horror

What the text doesn’t say is as important as what it does. It doesn’t explain the wrath. It doesn’t condemn the sacrifice explicitly. It doesn’t comfort us with easy answers about divine justice. It just records the terrible effectiveness of ultimate desperation and what extreme devotion to your God or ‘god’ can produce.

Maybe that’s because some human acts are so evil they break narrative conventions. Child sacrifice isn’t something you explain – it’s something you witness in horror and remember as a warning about how far human wickedness can go.

The king of Moab saved his city by destroying his future. He won the battle by losing everything that made victory worthwhile. That’s not divine approval – that’s the most pyrrhic victory in Scripture.

Key Takeaway

God doesn’t promise that evil will never appear to succeed temporarily. He promises that ultimately, justice will prevail. Sometimes the most faithful response to inexplicable evil isn’t understanding, but trusting that God’s character remains constant even when circumstances don’t make sense.

Subscribe
Notify of
0 Entries
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments

2 Kings 3:27 Commentary


When Human Sacrifice Seemingly Worked

What’s This Verse About?
The king of Moab is losing a battle against Israel, completely surrounded on the brink of defeat, he does the unthinkable and sacrifices his own son on the city wall. Suddenly, “great wrath” comes upon Israel and they have to retreat. It’s one of the Bible’s most unsettling verses because the pagan sacrifice seems to actually work; or maybe something else is going on?

The Hebrew That Changes Everything

The phrase in question is vayehi qetzef gadol al-Yisrael – “and there was great wrath upon Israel.” But whose wrath? The Hebrew word qetzef usually describes divine anger, but the text is deliberately ambiguous about the source.

Here’s what makes Hebrew scholars scratch their heads: the verb vayehi (there was) is passive. It doesn’t tell us who or what caused this wrath. It just… happens. After the sacrifice. And it’s effective enough to make three armies pack up in terror and run home.

The king “takes his firstborn son who was to reign after him” – the Hebrew bekoro emphasizes this isn’t just any son, but the heir, the future of the dynasty.

Ancient Grammar Geekery

The word for “offered” is *ya’aleh* – literally “caused to go up.” It’s the same term used for legitimate burnt offerings in the Temple. The author is using sacrificial language typically reserved for proper worship, which makes this even more disturbing.

What Would the Original Audience Have Heard?

Ancient Near Eastern listeners would have understood exactly what was happening here. When kings were desperate, they played their ultimate card: royal child sacrifice. Mesopotamian texts describe kings sacrificing their children to turn the tide of battle, and sometimes it worked.

But here’s what would have horrified Hebrew audiences: this happens right after Elisha performed a miracle providing water for Israel’s army (verses 16-20). God just demonstrated His power for Israel, and now a pagan sacrifice seems to override it? That’s theologically scandalous if true.

Did You Know?

The Moabite Stone (discovered in 1868) mentions King Mesha’s conflicts with Israel and his devotion to the god Chemosh. While it doesn’t mention child sacrifice, it shows Mesha was exactly the kind of king who would make such a desperate gambit.

But Wait… Did the Sacrifice Actually Work?

This is where the text gets maddeningly ambiguous. Three interpretations have dominated scholarly discussion for centuries:

  1. Divine wrath: God was angry at Israel for some unstated reason and used this moment to express it
  2. Moabite wrath: The people of Moab were so enraged by their king’s sacrifice that they fought with supernatural fury
  3. Israelite horror: The Israelites were so disgusted by witnessing child sacrifice that they lost the will to fight

The Hebrew supports all three readings. Maybe that’s intentional. Maybe the ambiguity is the point.

Wait, That’s Strange…

Israel had divine approval for this campaign – Elisha prophesied victory and provided miraculous water. So why does everything fall apart after one pagan ritual? The text offers no explanation, which makes it even more unsettling.

The Wrestling Match

This verse challenges everything we think we know about how God works. We expect pagan rituals to fail and divine promises to succeed. But here, the opposite happens. A father murders his son, and somehow it changes the entire trajectory of a divinely-ordained military campaign.

The most disturbing possibility is that God was disgusted by Israel’s willingness to witness child sacrifice without intervening. Maybe the “wrath” was God’s revulsion at His people’s moral passivity. The Israelites came to conquer but stayed to watch a child burn.

Or maybe as my mentor John Paul Jackson teaches – it was because Israel’s devotion to Him wasn’t as committed as the Moabite King was to his ‘god’. Scripture calls Him a jealous God for a reason.

Or maybe this is what happens when we reduce faith to a formula. God isn’t a vending machine where the right inputs guarantee the right outputs. Sometimes evil acts have consequences that disrupt even divine plans – not because God approves, but because human choices on this earth matter, even terrible ones.

Sometimes the most unsettling Bible verses are the ones that refuse to give us easy answers about how God works in a broken world.

How This Changes Everything

This passage demolishes any simplistic theology that says righteous people always win and evil always fails immediately. It forces us to grapple with the reality that we live in a world where horrific acts can have strategic consequences, where evil sometimes appears to triumph temporarily. But we Christians have read the end of the book and know the final outcome.

The text doesn’t celebrate the sacrifice or suggest it was effective because Chemosh is a real God. Instead, it records the brutal reality: sometimes human evil creates momentum that disrupts even God’s plans, not because God is weak, but because He gave the earth for man to rule over and He allows human choices – even abhorrent ones – to have real consequences.

Did you Know

This event happens during the ministry of Elisha, who regularly demonstrated God’s power through miracles. Yet here, human evil creates a situation where God’s prophet’s victory prediction doesn’t materialize as expected. The contrast is intentional and disturbing.

The Unspoken Horror

What the text doesn’t say is as important as what it does. It doesn’t explain the wrath. It doesn’t condemn the sacrifice explicitly. It doesn’t comfort us with easy answers about divine justice. It just records the terrible effectiveness of ultimate desperation and what extreme devotion to your God or ‘god’ can produce.

Maybe that’s because some human acts are so evil they break narrative conventions. Child sacrifice isn’t something you explain – it’s something you witness in horror and remember as a warning about how far human wickedness can go.

The king of Moab saved his city by destroying his future. He won the battle by losing everything that made victory worthwhile. That’s not divine approval – that’s the most pyrrhic victory in Scripture.

Key Takeaway

God doesn’t promise that evil will never appear to succeed temporarily. He promises that ultimately, justice will prevail. Sometimes the most faithful response to inexplicable evil isn’t understanding, but trusting that God’s character remains constant even when circumstances don’t make sense.

Subscribe
Notify of
0 Entries
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
Coffee mug svgrepo com


Coffee mug svgrepo com
Have a Coffee with Jesus
Read the New F.O.G Bibles
Get Challenges Quicker
0
Add/remove bookmark to personalize your Bible study.