When God Uses the Unexpected
What’s Judges 4 about?
This is the story of how God used two women – a prophet-judge named Deborah and a tent-dwelling nomad named Jael – to deliver Israel from twenty years of oppression. It’s a tale that would have shocked ancient audiences and still challenges our assumptions about how God works today.
The Full Context
Judges 4 takes place during one of Israel’s darkest periods, roughly 1200-1000 BCE, when “everyone did what was right in their own eyes.” The Israelites had fallen into their familiar cycle: prosperity led to forgetting God, which led to oppression by foreign powers, which led to crying out for help, which led to God raising up a deliverer. This time, their oppressor was Jabin, king of Hazor, whose military commander Sisera had terrorized Israel for twenty years with his advanced iron chariot technology.
What makes this story particularly striking is how it subverts every expectation of ancient Near Eastern warfare and leadership. In a world where military prowess was the ultimate mark of masculine honor, God chooses to work through women in the most decisive moments. Deborah, already established as both prophet and judge, calls out the reluctant military commander Barak, while Jael, a Kenite woman, delivers the final blow that ends Israel’s oppression. The author of Judges presents this not as an anomaly, but as a deliberate demonstration of how God’s power works through the unexpected.
What the Ancient Words Tell Us
The Hebrew in Judges 4:4 introduces Deborah with a fascinating title: ’eshet lapidot. Most translations render this as “wife of Lappidoth,” but here’s where it gets interesting – lapidot literally means “torches” or “flames.” Some scholars suggest this could mean “woman of torches” or “fiery woman,” describing her character rather than her marital status.
Grammar Geeks
The Hebrew phrase ’eshet lapidot is grammatically ambiguous. While it could mean “wife of Lappidoth,” it could equally mean “woman of flames/torches.” Given that we never hear about this supposed husband Lappidoth anywhere else in Scripture, and that Deborah is consistently identified by her own authority rather than through male relatives, the “fiery woman” interpretation gains credibility.
When Barak responds to Deborah’s command in Judges 4:8, he uses language that would have raised eyebrows in the ancient world. He essentially says, “I won’t go unless you come with me.” This isn’t just military strategy – it’s a public admission that he needs a woman’s presence to succeed. Deborah’s response is equally pointed: the honor (tipheret) of victory won’t belong to him, but to a woman.
The narrative reaches its climax with Jael’s actions in Judges 4:17-22. The Hebrew describes her approach with surgical precision. When she offers Sisera milk instead of the water he requested, she’s not just being hospitable – she’s being strategic. Warm milk would make him drowsier faster.
What Would the Original Audience Have Heard?
Ancient Near Eastern audiences would have been scandalized by this story – and that appears to be exactly the point. In a culture where women rarely held public leadership roles and military valor was the pinnacle of masculine achievement, having two women be the decisive factors in Israel’s victory would have been revolutionary.
The detail about Sisera’s iron chariots in Judges 4:3 cannot be overstated. This was cutting-edge military technology – the equivalent of tanks facing foot soldiers. For twenty years, these chariots had made Sisera seemingly invincible. Yet God orchestrates events so that this technological advantage becomes worthless.
Did You Know?
Archaeological evidence from sites like Hazor confirms that iron chariot technology gave Canaanite armies a massive advantage over Israelite forces in the 12th century BCE. The Israelites were primarily farmers and herders, while their enemies had professional armies equipped with the latest military innovations.
The original audience would also have caught the irony in Jael’s actions. Sisera seeks refuge with the Kenites because they had a peace treaty with Jabin (Judges 4:17). He thinks he’s found safety, but instead finds his doom. The tent peg and hammer Jael uses were women’s tools – she kills the great military commander with her everyday equipment.
Wrestling with the Text
This passage raises some uncomfortable questions that we shouldn’t brush aside. Was Jael’s deception and murder justified? She violated the sacred laws of hospitality, offering protection to a guest and then killing him while he slept. How do we reconcile this with our understanding of God’s character?
The text doesn’t explicitly condemn or praise Jael’s actions – it simply reports them. But Judges 5:24-27 (the song of Deborah) calls her “most blessed among women.” This suggests that the author viewed her actions as divinely orchestrated, even if they involved deception.
Wait, That’s Strange…
Notice that God doesn’t directly command either Deborah’s leadership or Jael’s decisive action. Instead, the narrative presents these women as responding to circumstances in ways that accomplish God’s purposes. It’s as if God works through their natural gifts and opportunities rather than overriding their personalities or situations.
Perhaps the point isn’t to provide a simple moral framework, but to show how God can work through flawed people in complex situations to accomplish His purposes. Both women operate within their cultural constraints while simultaneously transcending them.
How This Changes Everything
This story fundamentally challenges how we think about God’s power and methods. In our success-driven culture, we often assume God works through the strong, the influential, the obviously gifted. But Judges 4 suggests something radically different.
God doesn’t just use the unexpected – He seems to prefer it. Deborah leads from under a palm tree, not from a palace. Jael defeats the enemy with household tools, not military weapons. The victory comes not through superior strategy or technology, but through ordinary people responding to extraordinary opportunities.
“God’s strength isn’t diminished by working through the weak – it’s revealed by it.”
This has profound implications for how we understand our own potential impact. You don’t need a title, a platform, or perfect circumstances to be used by God. Sometimes the most significant kingdom work happens in tents and under trees, through conversations and everyday tools, by people who never expected to find themselves in positions of influence.
The story also reveals something crucial about leadership and courage. Barak, the designated military leader, needs encouragement to step up. Deborah, already in a position of spiritual authority, takes on additional military responsibility. Jael, with no official role, seizes a decisive moment. God uses all three, working through their different personalities and circumstances.
Key Takeaway
God’s power isn’t limited by our expectations about who He should use or how He should work. Sometimes the most unlikely people in the most ordinary circumstances become the instruments of extraordinary change.
Further Reading
Internal Links:
External Scholarly Resources:
