Choose This Day Whom You Will Serve
What’s Joshua 24 about?
Joshua gathers all Israel for one final speech – part history lesson, part altar call, part wedding ceremony. He walks them through God’s faithfulness from Abraham to the conquest, then drops the mic with history’s most famous ultimatum: “Choose this day whom you will serve.” It’s Israel’s moment to decide whether their covenant with God is real or just religious theater.
The Full Context
Picture this: an aging warrior-prophet standing before the entire nation of Israel at Shechem, the same place where Abraham first received God’s promise centuries earlier. Joshua knows his time is up, and he’s got one last chance to nail down Israel’s commitment to Yahweh before he dies. This isn’t just a farewell speech – it’s a covenant renewal ceremony that will determine whether Israel’s relationship with God survives Joshua’s generation.
The timing is crucial. Israel has settled in the Promised Land, but they’re surrounded by Canaanite cultures with seductive gods and easier moral standards. Joshua 24 serves as the climactic conclusion to the entire book, where all the military victories and land distributions culminate in this singular question: after everything God has done, will you actually follow Him? The chapter functions as both a historical record and a theological challenge, structured like an ancient treaty ceremony where vassals publicly commit to their king. Joshua is essentially asking Israel to sign on the dotted line of their covenant with God.
What the Ancient Words Tell Us
The Hebrew word Joshua uses for “choose” (bachar) is incredibly loaded. This isn’t the casual choice between coffee or tea – it’s the deliberate, costly selection of a spouse or a king. When Joshua says “choose this day,” he’s using a term that implies careful consideration, public commitment, and permanent consequences.
But here’s where it gets fascinating: Joshua tells them they cannot serve the Lord because He’s a “jealous God” (qanna). Wait, what? The word qanna doesn’t mean petty jealousy – it’s the fierce protectiveness of an exclusive relationship. Think of a husband who won’t share his wife, not a teenager who won’t share his toys. Joshua is essentially saying, “God’s standards are so high, His claim on you so total, that you need to count the cost before you make this promise.”
Grammar Geeks
The phrase “you cannot serve the Lord” uses a fascinating Hebrew construction that emphasizes inability rather than prohibition. Joshua isn’t saying “you’re not allowed to” but rather “you don’t have what it takes to.” It’s like telling someone they can’t climb Everest – not because it’s forbidden, but because they’re not prepared for what it requires.
The word for “serve” (abad) appears over and over in this chapter, and it’s the same word used for slavery. Joshua is making it crystal clear: you’re going to serve somebody. The question isn’t whether you’ll be a slave, but which master you’ll choose. This cuts through any illusion that following God is just adding Him to your pantheon of interests – He demands exclusive lordship.
What Would the Original Audience Have Heard?
Standing at Shechem, every Israelite would have felt the weight of history pressing down on them. This wasn’t just any random field – this was where Abraham built his first altar in Canaan, where Jacob buried the foreign gods under the oak tree, where the tribes had earlier shouted blessings and curses from Mount Gerizim and Mount Ebal. The location itself was preaching.
When Joshua recounted their history from Abraham to the conquest, he was doing more than giving a Sunday school lesson. In ancient Near Eastern culture, historical recitals like this were standard treaty language – the great king would remind his vassals of all his mighty acts and benefits before demanding their loyalty. But notice what Joshua emphasizes: at every crucial moment, God acted while Israel was passive. “I gave you…” “I sent…” “I delivered…” This isn’t a pep talk about Israel’s greatness – it’s a reality check about God’s grace.
Did You Know?
Archaeological evidence from Shechem shows it was a major Canaanite religious center with temples to local gods. By choosing this location for the covenant ceremony, Joshua was essentially throwing down the gauntlet in enemy territory – declaring Yahweh’s supremacy right in the backyard of the competition.
The audience would have also caught something modern readers often miss: Joshua’s challenge contains an implicit criticism of their current spiritual state. When he says “put away the foreign gods that are among you,” he’s revealing that they’re already compromised. This isn’t prevention – it’s intervention. They’ve been hedging their bets, keeping some Canaanite gods around “just in case,” and Joshua is calling them out.
But Wait… Why Did They Need to Choose Again?
Here’s what’s genuinely puzzling: hadn’t Israel already chosen God? They’d received the Law at Sinai, crossed the Jordan, conquered Jericho, divided the land – why does Joshua act like they’re starting from scratch?
The answer reveals something uncomfortable about human nature and covenant relationship. Israel had been following God’s commands and enjoying His benefits, but that’s not the same as wholehearted commitment. They were like someone who goes through the motions of marriage while keeping their options open. Joshua recognizes that external compliance doesn’t equal internal allegiance.
This is why he structures the ceremony like he does – it’s not enough for them to passively benefit from God’s blessings. He forces them to make an active, public, verbal commitment. The Hebrew construction suggests ongoing choice: “Keep choosing, day by day, whom you will serve.” It’s not a one-time decision but a daily recommitment.
Wait, That’s Strange…
Joshua sets up what looks like a lose-lose scenario. He tells them to choose God, then immediately tells them they can’t serve Him successfully, then accepts their commitment anyway. What’s going on? This apparent contradiction is actually brilliant psychology – by highlighting the difficulty, he ensures their commitment is informed and serious, not just emotional enthusiasm.
Wrestling with the Text
The most challenging part of this chapter might be Joshua’s blunt assertion that they “cannot serve the Lord.” Is he being discouraging? Reverse psychology? Or revealing something deeper about the nature of covenant relationship?
I think Joshua is doing something profoundly pastoral here. He’s refusing to let them make a shallow commitment based on emotional highs or cultural pressure. By emphasizing God’s holiness and jealousy, he’s forcing them to grapple with what exclusive devotion actually means. It’s like a pastor who refuses to marry a couple until they’ve gone through serious counseling – not to discourage them, but to ensure they know what they’re getting into.
The three-fold repetition of their commitment (“We will serve the Lord”) shows this isn’t impulse – it’s deliberate decision. Each time they affirm their choice, Joshua raises the stakes higher, until finally he accepts their commitment and makes them “witnesses against yourselves.” This is covenant-making at its most serious: they’ve publicly bound themselves with their own words.
How This Changes Everything
Here’s what hits me every time I read this passage: Joshua refuses to let Israel’s relationship with God be casual or assumed. He forces them – and us – to confront the reality that following God is a conscious, costly, ongoing choice that can’t be taken for granted.
This demolishes any notion that being God’s people is about heritage, culture, or religious routine. It’s about daily, deliberate decision to serve Him exclusively. The text won’t let us hide behind “I was raised Christian” or “I go to church” – it demands that we personally, publicly choose our allegiance.
“The most dangerous thing in the spiritual life isn’t outright rebellion – it’s the assumption that yesterday’s commitment covers today’s choices.”
But notice the grace woven through Joshua’s challenge. Even after warning them they can’t serve the Lord, he accepts their commitment and sets up a stone witness. He’s not trying to discourage them – he’s trying to ensure their devotion is real enough to last. The very fact that he gives them this choice reveals God’s respect for human agency and His desire for genuine relationship rather than forced compliance.
The chapter also establishes something crucial: covenant renewal isn’t a one-time event but an ongoing necessity. Every generation, every individual, must personally choose their allegiance. Faith isn’t inherited – it’s decided.
Key Takeaway
Every day presents the same fundamental choice Joshua placed before Israel: will you serve the Lord exclusively, or will you hedge your bets with other loyalties? The question isn’t whether you’ll serve something, but whether you’ll serve the God who has already proven His faithfulness to you.
Further Reading
Internal Links:
External Scholarly Resources:
