When the Promised Land Gets Complicated
What’s Joshua 17 about?
This chapter shows us what happens when God’s promises meet human realities – the daughters of Zelophehad fight for their inheritance while tribes complain about their land portions. It’s a fascinating glimpse into how faith communities navigate fairness, entitlement, and the messiness of actually living in God’s promises.
The Full Context
Joshua 17 sits right in the middle of the land distribution process, and honestly, it’s where things start getting a bit messy. We’re watching the Israelites transition from conquest mode to “actually living here” mode, and surprise – it’s complicated. The chapter focuses on two main events: a legal case involving women’s inheritance rights and some serious complaining from the powerful tribes of Ephraim and Manasseh about their land allocations. This isn’t just administrative paperwork; it’s the rubber meeting the road of covenant community.
What makes this chapter particularly interesting is how it reveals the tension between divine promise and human expectation. The land distribution wasn’t happening in a vacuum – it was happening among real people with real needs, family histories, and let’s be honest, some pretty strong opinions about what they deserved. The author of Joshua is showing us that even in the midst of God’s faithfulness, his people still had to wrestle with questions of justice, inheritance, and whether they’d gotten a fair deal. It’s a remarkably honest portrait of what it looks like when the people of God try to figure out how to live together in the land of promise.
What the Ancient Words Tell Us
The Hebrew in this chapter is doing some heavy lifting, especially when we get to the daughters of Zelophehad. When they come before Eleazar and Joshua, the text says they darash their inheritance – they “sought” or “demanded” it. This isn’t a polite request; it’s a legal petition based on what Moses had already established. The verb carries weight – these women aren’t begging, they’re claiming what’s rightfully theirs.
Grammar Geeks
The phrase “according to the commandment of the Lord” (al-pi YHWH) literally means “by the mouth of the Lord.” When the text says the daughters received their inheritance this way, it’s emphasizing that this isn’t just Joshua being nice – this is God’s direct command being fulfilled. The mouth of God has spoken, and that settles it.
But here’s where it gets really interesting – when the Ephraim and Manasseh tribes complain about their portion, they use the word goral for “lot.” This is the same word used for the sacred lots that determined land distribution. They’re essentially saying, “We know God gave us this through the lot system, but we’re not happy about it.” That’s some serious audacity right there.
The response Joshua gives them uses the verb barach – to “clear” or “cut down.” He’s basically saying, “If you’re so numerous and powerful, go clear your own additional land.” It’s not exactly what they wanted to hear.
What Would the Original Audience Have Heard?
Picture this: you’re an Israelite family that’s been wandering in the wilderness for forty years, and now you’re finally settling into your promised inheritance. But instead of everything being neat and tidy, you’re hearing stories about legal disputes, tribal complaints, and the ongoing challenge of actually possessing what God has given you.
The original audience would have immediately recognized the significance of the Zelophehad case. These daughters weren’t just fighting for property – they were fighting for their family name to continue in Israel. In a culture where inheritance passed through male lines, their case was revolutionary. And the fact that Moses had already ruled in their favor? That gave their claim the weight of established law.
Did You Know?
The daughters of Zelophehad appear three times in the Old Testament – in Numbers 26, Numbers 27, and here in Joshua 17. Their case established a precedent that protected women’s inheritance rights and ensured family names wouldn’t disappear from tribal records. This was groundbreaking legal precedent in the ancient Near East.
But the Ephraim and Manasseh complaint would have hit differently. These were the tribes descended from Joseph – the favored son who saved Egypt and his family. They were used to being special, and now they’re complaining that their portion isn’t adequate for their numbers. The original audience would have heard echoes of the wilderness complaints here – the same spirit that led to forty years of wandering.
But Wait… Why Did They…?
Here’s something that might puzzle modern readers: why are Ephraim and Manasseh complaining when they received two portions (since Manasseh was split between east and west of the Jordan)? Shouldn’t they be grateful?
The answer lies in their sense of entitlement. These tribes had grown powerful and numerous, and they expected their inheritance to match their status. But there’s another layer here – they’re specifically complaining about the Canaanites who are still in their territory, saying they can’t drive them out because they have iron chariots.
Wait a minute. Didn’t God promise to drive out all the inhabitants? Didn’t Joshua just finish telling us about all these victories? The text is revealing something uncomfortable: some of the tribes were losing their nerve when it came to actually possessing what God had given them.
Wait, That’s Strange…
The tribes complain they can’t handle iron chariots, but back in Judges 1:19, we’ll learn that “the Lord was with Judah, and he took possession of the hill country, but he could not drive out the inhabitants of the plain because they had chariots of iron.” Even the faithful tribe of Judah struggled with this. Iron technology was relatively new and represented a significant military advantage – these weren’t just regular chariots.
Wrestling with the Text
This chapter forces us to grapple with some uncomfortable truths about living in God’s promises. The daughters of Zelophehad show us what it looks like to persistently pursue what God has declared rightfully ours. They didn’t just accept the status quo; they fought for their inheritance based on God’s word through Moses.
But the tribes of Ephraim and Manasseh show us the flip side – what happens when we expect God’s promises to come without effort on our part. They wanted the benefits of their inheritance without the hard work of actually possessing it. Joshua’s response is brilliant: “If you’re as numerous and powerful as you claim, then act like it. Go clear the land yourselves.”
“Sometimes the biggest obstacle to living in God’s promises isn’t external opposition – it’s our own reluctance to do the hard work of actually possessing what he’s given us.”
There’s also something profound happening with the land allocation system itself. The lots weren’t random – they were understood as God’s method of dividing the inheritance fairly. But fairness doesn’t always feel fair, especially when you think you deserve more than you got. The text is showing us how God’s people navigate the tension between divine sovereignty and human expectations.
How This Changes Everything
This passage completely reframes how we think about inheritance and entitlement in the kingdom of God. The daughters of Zelophehad teach us that pursuing what God has promised isn’t presumptuous – it’s faithful. They based their claim not on their feelings or their circumstances, but on what God had already declared through his servant Moses.
Meanwhile, the Ephraim and Manasseh situation shows us that blessing often comes with responsibility. Being chosen doesn’t mean everything gets handed to you on a silver platter. Sometimes God’s answer to “we need more” is “then go get it.”
The chapter also reveals something beautiful about how God’s justice works in community. The daughters’ case isn’t just about them – it’s about establishing a precedent that protects the vulnerable and ensures that God’s promises reach everyone they’re meant to reach. Their victory becomes a victory for justice itself.
But perhaps most importantly, this chapter shows us that living in God’s promises is an ongoing process, not a one-time event. The Israelites had entered the land, but they still had to possess it. They had received their inheritance, but they still had to claim it. The gap between promise and possession requires faith, persistence, and sometimes the willingness to do hard things.
Key Takeaway
God’s promises require both faith to claim them and courage to possess them – and sometimes the biggest battle isn’t with external enemies but with our own expectations and reluctance to do the hard work of actually living in what he’s given us.
Further Reading
Internal Links:
External Scholarly Resources:
