Genesis 17 – When God Shows Up with New Names
What’s this chapter about?
God appears to 99-year-old Abram and drops some major bombshells: a new name for himself (El Shaddai), new names for Abram and Sarai (Abraham and Sarah), and the promise that they’ll finally have that son they’ve been waiting decades for. It’s a covenant renewal ceremony with some pretty permanent markers attached.
The Full Context
Genesis 17 comes at a crucial turning point in Abraham’s story. Thirteen years have passed since the Hagar incident in Genesis 16, and Abram is now 99 years old. Sarah is 89. The promise of offspring seems more impossible than ever from a human perspective. This divine encounter isn’t just a friendly check-in—it’s God establishing the covenant that will define his relationship with Abraham’s descendants forever.
The literary structure of Genesis 17 is carefully crafted, moving from divine self-revelation to covenant establishment to the sign of circumcision. This chapter serves as the climactic covenant ceremony in the Abraham narrative, where promises made in earlier chapters become formal, binding agreements. The cultural background is essential here: ancient Near Eastern covenant-making involved specific rituals, name changes, and physical signs that made agreements legally and socially binding. What we’re witnessing is God adapting these familiar cultural forms to establish something revolutionary—a relationship between the divine and human that will reshape history.
What the Ancient Words Tell Us
The chapter opens with God revealing himself by a name we haven’t heard before: El Shaddai. Most translations render this as “God Almighty,” but the Hebrew is far more nuanced and honestly, a bit mysterious. The root shad likely connects to power and sufficiency, but some scholars see connections to mountains (shadayim) or even to nourishment and provision.
Grammar Geeks
The Hebrew El Shaddai appears 48 times in the Old Testament, with 31 of those in Job alone. The El part means “God” or “mighty one,” but Shaddai is one of those Hebrew words that makes translators pull their hair out. Ancient Jewish interpreters connected it to the idea of “the One who is sufficient” – as in, God needs nothing but provides everything.
What’s fascinating is the timing of this name revelation. When promises seem impossible, God introduces himself as the God who is more than enough. The name carries this sense of overwhelming adequacy—not just powerful, but powerful in exactly the ways needed for the situation at hand.
Then come the name changes. Abram becomes Abraham, and Sarai becomes Sarah. In ancient cultures, names weren’t just labels—they were identity statements. When God changes someone’s name, he’s literally reshaping their destiny.
What Would the Original Audience Have Heard?
Ancient readers would have immediately recognized this as a formal covenant ceremony. The structure follows patterns they knew well: divine self-identification, covenant terms, and a physical sign to seal the agreement. But several elements would have startled them.
First, the age factor. Ninety-nine years old? In a culture where life expectancy was much shorter, Abraham was ancient. The original audience would have gasped at the audacity of promising offspring to someone this old. This wasn’t just unlikely—it was ridiculous.
Did You Know?
Archaeological evidence from the ancient Near East shows that covenant ceremonies often involved cutting rituals and name changes. What made this covenant unique was that only God “walked between the pieces” (as in Genesis 15), taking full responsibility for keeping the covenant terms. Most ancient treaties were mutual obligation contracts.
Second, the universal scope would have been shocking. Ancient deities were typically tribal or national gods. But this God promises that Abraham will be “a father of many nations” (ab hamon goyim). The Hebrew goyim usually refers to non-Jewish peoples. God is essentially saying, “This isn’t just about one ethnic group—this is about everyone.”
The circumcision requirement would have been both familiar and strange. Egyptians practiced circumcision, as did other Semitic peoples, but usually as a rite of passage into adulthood. Making it a sign of covenant relationship with God—and requiring it for infants—was revolutionary.
But Wait… Why Did They…?
Here’s something that puzzles many readers: Why does Abraham laugh (Genesis 17:17)? And why doesn’t God rebuke him the way he later rebukes Sarah for laughing in Genesis 18:12-15?
The Hebrew word used for Abraham’s laughter is tsachaq, the same root that will become Isaac’s name (Yitschaq – “he laughs”). But context suggests Abraham’s laughter might be different from Sarah’s. Some interpreters see Abraham’s response as laughter of joy mixed with amazement, while Sarah’s is skeptical laughter.
Wait, That’s Strange…
Notice that God changes Sarai’s name to Sarah, but both names mean “princess” or “noblewoman.” The change is subtle—from “my princess” (with a possessive suffix) to simply “princess.” Some scholars suggest this represents her moving from being just Abraham’s princess to being a princess in her own right, the mother of nations.
Another puzzle: Why circumcision? Of all the possible signs God could have chosen, why this particular one? The location is significant—it’s connected to procreation, to the very area of the body through which the promised offspring will come. It’s also hidden, not a public display like other ancient covenant signs. This creates an intimate, personal mark of relationship with God.
Wrestling with the Text
The question that haunts this chapter is the same one that haunted Abraham: How do you trust promises that seem impossible? Abraham has been waiting 24 years since the initial promise in Genesis 12:2. He’s tried to help God out with Hagar. He’s gotten older and older. And now God shows up with even bigger promises.
“Sometimes the gap between promise and fulfillment isn’t God being slow—it’s God being thorough.”
The covenant structure in Genesis 17 is what theologians call “unilateral”—God makes unconditional promises and takes full responsibility for keeping them. But there’s still a requirement: circumcision. This creates a tension. Is the covenant conditional or unconditional?
The answer seems to be both. God’s promises don’t depend on human performance, but participation in the covenant community requires a response. Circumcision isn’t earning the promise—it’s accepting it. It’s saying, “Yes, I want to be part of this story God is writing.”
How This Changes Everything
Genesis 17 isn’t just ancient history—it’s the foundation for understanding how God relates to people. The patterns established here echo throughout Scripture. God reveals himself by name. He makes promises that seem impossible. He provides a sign to mark the relationship. He asks for a response that demonstrates faith.
The name Abraham receives—“father of many nations”—was a daily reminder of God’s promise. Every time someone called his name, they were declaring God’s intention to bless the world through this family line. Names have power, and God was literally changing Abraham’s identity from “exalted father” (Abram) to “father of multitudes” (Abraham).
The circumcision requirement connects the physical and spiritual in ways that would influence Jewish identity for millennia. It made covenant membership visible (at least to other males) and created a clear boundary between those who belonged to God’s people and those who didn’t.
But perhaps most significantly, this chapter establishes the principle that God’s timeline isn’t our timeline. Abraham waited decades for Isaac. The promise of “many nations” would take centuries to unfold. God operates on generational scales, not quarterly reports.
Key Takeaway
When God makes promises that seem impossible, he’s not being unrealistic—he’s being God. The gap between promise and fulfillment isn’t a sign of God’s weakness but of his thoroughness in preparing us for what he wants to give.
Further Reading
Internal Links:
External Scholarly Resources:
