When Jesus Talked About the Hard Stuff: Marriage, Money, and What Really Matters
What’s Matthew 19 about?
This chapter tackles some of life’s most challenging questions through three encounters with Jesus – religious leaders testing him about divorce, parents bringing children for blessing, and a wealthy young man asking about eternal life. It’s Jesus at his most direct, addressing our deepest needs for love, acceptance, and purpose.
The Full Context
Matthew 19 marks a pivotal transition in Jesus’ ministry as he leaves Galilee and heads toward Jerusalem for the final time. The crowds are still following, but the opposition is intensifying. Religious leaders aren’t just questioning Jesus anymore – they’re actively trying to trap him with politically and theologically loaded questions. The divorce debate wasn’t academic; it was splitting Pharisaic schools and could easily be turned into ammunition against Jesus with either religious or political authorities.
This chapter reveals Jesus’ approach to some of humanity’s most fundamental concerns: the permanence of relationships, the value of the vulnerable, and our relationship with material wealth. Each encounter builds on the previous one, creating a portrait of the kingdom of heaven that challenges conventional wisdom about power, status, and security. Matthew places these stories strategically as Jesus approaches his final confrontation in Jerusalem, showing how the values of God’s kingdom often invert worldly expectations.
What the Ancient Words Tell Us
The Greek in this chapter is loaded with intention. When the Pharisees ask about divorce “for any reason” (kata pasan aitian), they’re referencing a specific rabbinic debate. Rabbi Hillel taught that a man could divorce his wife for almost anything – even burning his dinner. Rabbi Shammai insisted only adultery justified divorce. They weren’t asking Jesus for pastoral advice; they were forcing him to pick sides in a theological civil war.
Grammar Geeks
When Jesus says “from the beginning it was not so,” he uses ap’ archēs, which doesn’t just mean “at first” – it points to God’s original design before sin entered the picture. He’s not just giving legal advice; he’s calling them back to Eden.
But here’s where it gets interesting: Jesus doesn’t just quote Scripture – he interprets it through the lens of God’s original intention. When he says God “made them male and female” and they become “one flesh,” he’s using sarx mia – not just physical union, but the creation of a new, unified entity. It’s like two rivers converging into something entirely new.
The disciples’ response is telling: “If this is the situation between a husband and wife, it is better not to marry!” They’ve been thinking about marriage as a contract you could get out of when convenient. Jesus just redefined it as a covenant – and that scared them.
What Would the Original Audience Have Heard?
Picture this scene: you’re in the first-century Holy Land, where women have virtually no legal rights and can be discarded for the most trivial reasons. A woman divorced “for any reason” faced social disgrace, economic ruin, and often destitution. Her children could be taken from her. She couldn’t simply “start over” like in modern society.
When Jesus spoke about marriage permanence, the women in the crowd weren’t hearing restrictive rules – they were hearing protection and dignity. He was saying their marriages mattered, their commitment had value, and they couldn’t be tossed aside on a whim.
Did You Know?
In ancient Jewish culture, children had no legal status until age 12-13. They were considered economic burdens rather than blessings. When Jesus welcomed them and said “the kingdom of heaven belongs to such as these,” he was elevating the powerless to the highest position in society.
The rich young ruler represented everything first-century Jews admired – wealth was seen as God’s blessing, and keeping the law was the path to righteousness. When Jesus told him to sell everything, the crowd would have been as shocked as the young man. Wealth wasn’t just comfort; it was proof of divine favor.
Wrestling with the Text
But here’s where things get complicated. If Jesus is talking about God’s ideal for marriage, why does he mention an exception for adultery? And what about his cryptic comment about “eunuchs who choose to live like eunuchs for the sake of the kingdom”?
The porneia exception has puzzled scholars for centuries. Some think it refers to incestuous marriages that should never have happened. Others see it as adultery that breaks the covenant so completely that divorce becomes recognition of an already-destroyed union. What’s clear is that Jesus isn’t providing an easy out – he’s acknowledging that sin can shatter what God intended to be unbreakable.
Wait, That’s Strange…
Why does Jesus tell his disciples it’s better for children to come to him than to prevent them, but then immediately talk about cutting off hands and gouging out eyes if they cause sin? The jarring contrast suggests he’s making a point about how seriously we should take our influence on the vulnerable.
The “eunuch” saying is equally puzzling. In context, it seems Jesus is saying that if marriage is this serious and permanent, some people might choose singleness to devote themselves entirely to kingdom work. But he’s careful to say “the one who can accept this should accept it” – it’s not a command, but a calling for those who can handle it.
How This Changes Everything
This chapter isn’t really about marriage, money, or children – it’s about the kingdom of heaven breaking into our broken world. Jesus consistently elevates those society devalues: women who could be divorced for burning dinner, children considered legal non-entities, and ultimately anyone willing to become “like a child” regardless of their wealth or status.
The thread connecting all three encounters is humility. The Pharisees approached with clever traps. The disciples tried to shoo away bothersome children. The rich young man came confident in his righteousness. But the kingdom belongs to those who come empty-handed, knowing they need everything God offers.
“Jesus doesn’t ask us to be perfect – he asks us to be honest about our need for grace.”
When Jesus says it’s easier for a camel to go through the eye of a needle than for a rich person to enter heaven, the disciples ask, “Who then can be saved?” Jesus’ answer cuts to the heart of the gospel: “With man this is impossible, but with God all things are possible.” None of us can earn our way in – rich or poor, married or single, adult or child.
Key Takeaway
The kingdom of heaven isn’t about having the right qualifications or following the right rules – it’s about coming to Jesus with the open-handed trust of a child, knowing that what’s impossible for us is possible with God.
Further Reading
Internal Links:
External Scholarly Resources:
