When God Uses Lost Donkeys to Find Kings
What’s 1 Samuel 9 about?
A young man named Saul goes looking for his father’s lost donkeys and accidentally bumps into the prophet Samuel, who’s been waiting to anoint Israel’s first king. Sometimes God’s biggest plans start with life’s smallest problems.
The Full Context
Picture this: Israel is at a crossroads. For generations, they’ve been a loose confederation of tribes held together by judges who rose up in times of crisis. But now they’re tired of being different from everyone else. They want a king “like all the nations” (1 Samuel 8:5). Samuel, the aging prophet-judge, is heartbroken by their request, but God tells him to give them what they want – along with a stern warning about what kingship will cost them.
1 Samuel 9 opens this pivotal narrative by introducing us to Saul through the most ordinary of circumstances: a livestock emergency. The chapter serves as the hinge between Israel’s theocratic past and its monarchical future. What’s brilliant about this passage is how it shows God’s sovereignty working through the mundane – lost animals, worried fathers, and chance encounters. The author wants us to see that even when people make choices that grieve God’s heart, He doesn’t abandon His purposes or His people.
What the Ancient Words Tell Us
The Hebrew text of 1 Samuel 9 is rich with irony that gets lost in translation. When we first meet Saul, he’s described as bāchur – a “choice” or “chosen” young man. But here’s the twist: the same root word (bāchar) is used throughout the Old Testament for God’s choosing of His people. The narrator is already dropping hints that this handsome, head-and-shoulders-above-everyone farmer’s son is God’s chosen one.
Grammar Geeks
The phrase “there was not a man among the people of Israel more handsome than he” uses the Hebrew construction ’ên ’îsh, which literally means “there was no man.” It’s not just saying Saul was good-looking – it’s saying he was in a category by himself, unmatched among all Israel.
But here’s where it gets interesting. The word for “lost” (’ābad) when describing the donkeys isn’t just about misplaced livestock. This same verb means “to perish” or “to be destroyed.” In Hebrew thought, something that’s ’ābad is beyond human help – it requires divine intervention to restore. The narrator is subtly telling us that what appears to be a simple case of wandering animals is actually a setup for something much bigger.
What Would the Original Audience Have Heard?
Ancient Near Eastern readers would have immediately picked up on several cultural cues we miss today. First, the fact that Kish owned donkeys meant he wasn’t just any farmer – donkeys were valuable assets, often worth more than a year’s wages. Sending his son on a three-day search expedition shows both the animals’ value and the family’s resources.
Did You Know?
In ancient Israel, losing your father’s livestock wasn’t just inconvenient – it could be catastrophic. Donkeys were the pickup trucks of the ancient world, essential for trade, travel, and farm work. A family’s economic survival often depended on their animals.
The mention of Saul being “a head taller than any of the people” would have resonated powerfully with ancient audiences. In a world where physical prowess often determined leadership, height wasn’t just about appearance – it signaled strength, authority, and the ability to be seen in battle. When people chose kings, they wanted someone who looked the part.
But there’s something else happening here that the original audience would have caught: the theme of divine appointment through unlikely circumstances. They knew their history – how Moses was found in the bulrushes, how David was pulled from the sheep fields, how Gideon was hiding in a winepress. God’s pattern was clear: He delights in using the unexpected to accomplish His purposes.
Wrestling with the Text
Here’s where things get fascinating – and a little uncomfortable. 1 Samuel 9:15-16 tells us that God revealed to Samuel the day before that He would send him “a man from the land of Benjamin, and you shall anoint him to be prince over my people Israel.”
But wait – didn’t God just spend an entire chapter in 1 Samuel 8 warning about the dangers of kingship? Didn’t He call their request a rejection of His own rule? So why is He now orchestrating this elaborate divine appointment?
Wait, That’s Strange…
God seems to be simultaneously opposing Israel’s desire for a king and actively working to give them one. It’s like a parent who says “You’ll regret this” while still helping you get what you want. What’s going on here?
This tension reveals something profound about how God works in history. He doesn’t always prevent us from making choices that grieve Him, but He doesn’t abandon His purposes either. Sometimes God’s will includes working within our rebellion, not just despite it. The text suggests that while God would have preferred Israel to remain under His direct rule, He’s willing to work through their monarchical experiment to accomplish His larger purposes.
There’s also the intriguing detail about Saul looking for Samuel to inquire about the donkeys. The Hebrew word for “inquire” (shā’al) is actually a play on Saul’s name (Shā’ûl), which means “asked for.” The one who was “asked for” by the people is now doing the asking. These wordplays weren’t accidents – they were the biblical authors’ way of showing that God’s hand was orchestrating events even when it didn’t look that way.
How This Changes Everything
Here’s what 1 Samuel 9 teaches us about how God works: He meets us in our mundane moments. Saul wasn’t seeking a throne – he was seeking livestock. He wasn’t pursuing destiny – he was just trying to solve a family problem. But God was already three steps ahead, turning a livestock crisis into a leadership appointment.
The chapter also reveals God’s incredible patience with our imperfect choices. Israel’s demand for a king wasn’t His ideal, but He doesn’t just say “Fine, figure it out yourselves.” Instead, He provides them with the best possible king for their situation – someone who looks the part, comes from the right background, and has the physical presence to unite the tribes.
“Sometimes God’s biggest plans start with our smallest problems, and His greatest purposes unfold through our most ordinary days.”
But there’s a warning embedded in this narrative too. Saul starts well – he’s humble, he’s reluctant about leadership, he’s genuinely seeking guidance. But the very qualities that make him attractive as a king (physical stature, impressive appearance, popular appeal) will later become liabilities when he starts trusting in them more than in God. The text is already hinting that external qualifications, while impressive, aren’t enough to sustain godly leadership.
The most beautiful part of this story is how it shows God’s commitment to His people even when they’re making spiritually immature choices. He doesn’t give them a king to punish them – He gives them the best king He can within the parameters of their request. It’s like a loving parent who, when their child insists on touching the stove, makes sure they’re standing by with ice and bandages.
Key Takeaway
God often uses our everyday problems as doorways to His extraordinary purposes. When we’re faithful in small things – even frustrating things like lost donkeys – He may be preparing us for responsibilities we never imagined.
Further Reading
Internal Links:
External Scholarly Resources:
