When Everything Falls Apart, Where Do You Hang Your Harp?
What’s Psalm 137 about?
This is one of the rawest, most emotionally honest prayers in Scripture – a song written by Jewish exiles sitting by Babylon’s rivers, weeping over Jerusalem’s destruction while their captors mock them. It moves from grief to defiance to a shocking cry for vengeance that makes modern readers squirm.
The Full Context
Psalm 137 emerges from one of the darkest chapters in Jewish history – the Babylonian exile (586 BCE). After Jerusalem’s walls were breached, the temple destroyed, and the elite dragged off to Babylon, someone sat down and wrote this brutally honest lament. The author remains anonymous, but they were clearly an eyewitness to both the destruction and the exile that followed. This wasn’t written for a worship service or royal court – this was therapy on parchment, a community processing trauma together.
The psalm fits within the broader collection of lament psalms, but it’s unique in its geographic specificity and its unflinching portrayal of both grief and rage. Unlike many psalms that move from complaint to praise, this one ends in darkness – which tells us something profound about how the biblical writers understood that not every prayer needs a neat, happy ending. Sometimes faith means sitting with the pain and letting God hear your unfiltered heart.
What the Ancient Words Tell Us
The Hebrew here is visceral. When the psalmist says “we wept” (bakinu), it’s not gentle tears – it’s the kind of sobbing that shakes your whole body. The word choice throughout is deliberate and devastating.
Grammar Geeks
The phrase “by the rivers of Babylon” uses the Hebrew preposition al, which can mean “by” or “over.” Some scholars suggest this could be translated “over the rivers” – meaning they’re weeping so hard their tears are literally falling into Babylon’s waterways. The exile’s grief is mixing with foreign waters.
Notice how the psalm moves through three distinct emotional stages, each marked by different Hebrew vocabulary. First comes zakhar (remembering) – but this isn’t nostalgic reminiscence. It’s the kind of remembering that cuts like a knife. Then comes the mocking request to “sing us a song of Zion” – and the Hebrew word shir here feels almost obscene in context. How do you sing worship songs when everything you worshipped is rubble?
The final section unleashes vocabulary of vengeance that’s shocking even in ancient Near Eastern literature. The psalmist doesn’t just want Babylon defeated – they want their infants dashed against rocks. The Hebrew word te’ashre (blessed/happy) applied to whoever commits this violence is jarring beyond description.
What Would the Original Audience Have Heard?
Did You Know?
Babylon’s rivers weren’t just convenient places to sit and cry. In Mesopotamian culture, rivers were considered sacred spaces where the divine and human worlds intersected. The exiles were literally taking their deepest prayers to what their captors considered holy ground.
Picture this: You’ve lost everything. Your city is ash, your temple is rubble, your king is in chains. You’re living in a foreign land where people worship different gods and speak a different language. And then your captors – the very people who destroyed your world – come up and say, “Hey, sing us one of those famous Jewish songs! Give us some of that religious music you’re known for!”
The audacity is breathtaking. It’s like asking someone at a funeral to perform comedy. The request reveals how completely the Babylonians misunderstood what they’d destroyed. To them, Jewish worship music was entertainment. To the exiles, it was the sound of a world that no longer existed.
When they hang their harps on the willow trees, they’re not just refusing to perform – they’re declaring that music itself has died. The kinnor (lyre) was the instrument of joy, of celebration, of temple worship. Silent harps hanging from foreign trees is the image of faith in suspended animation.
Wrestling with the Text
Here’s where this psalm gets really uncomfortable for modern readers. We can handle the grief – that feels appropriate. We can even understand the defiance when they refuse to sing. But then comes verse 9: “Blessed is the one who seizes your infants and dashes them against the rocks.”
Wait, That’s Strange…
This isn’t the only place in Scripture where we see prayers for violent revenge against enemies’ children. Similar language appears in Hosea 13:16 and Isaiah 13:16. Ancient warfare routinely included killing enemy children to prevent future revenge – but should this be in our Bible?
Some scholars argue this is hyperbolic – emotional language that’s not meant to be taken literally. Others point out that the psalmist isn’t promising to commit these acts themselves, just declaring that whoever does will be “blessed” by God. Still others suggest this is simply raw human emotion that God allows into Scripture because honest faith includes our darkest thoughts.
But maybe we’re missing something crucial here. The psalmist has witnessed Babylonian soldiers doing exactly this to Jewish children. 2 Kings 25:7 tells us Nebuchadnezzar killed King Zedekiah’s sons before his eyes. The violence the psalmist wishes on Babylon is the same violence Babylon inflicted on Jerusalem.
This isn’t random cruelty – it’s the lex talionis (law of retaliation) crying out for cosmic justice. The question isn’t whether such prayers are appropriate, but whether they’re honest – and honest they certainly are.
How This Changes Everything
What if this psalm isn’t teaching us to hate our enemies, but showing us that God can handle our hatred? What if the point isn’t that vengeance prayers are good, but that they’re real – and faith big enough to include our worst thoughts is bigger than faith that pretends those thoughts don’t exist?
“Sometimes the most faithful thing you can do is hang your harp on a tree and admit that today, there are no songs.”
The psalm doesn’t end with the psalmist getting over their anger or finding peace. It ends in rage. And it’s in the Bible. That tells us something profound about how God relates to human trauma. He doesn’t need us to clean up our prayers before we bring them to him.
This changes how we read not just this psalm, but how we approach faith in crisis. The psalm gives us permission to be devastated. It gives us permission to be angry. It gives us permission to hang our harps on trees when worship feels impossible.
But it also shows us that even our darkest prayers are still prayers – still communication with the God who can handle our unfiltered hearts.
Key Takeaway
Faith doesn’t require you to sing when your world is burning – sometimes the most honest worship is hanging your harp on a tree and letting God hear your silence.
Further Reading
Internal Links:
External Scholarly Resources:
